The pilot is the step after a free sample. It is for teams that want recurring curated shortlists and want to test whether the workflow actually saves review time before committing to anything larger.
The strongest early fit is small-to-mid K-12-focused MSP, MSSP, MDR, and cyber-consulting teams with a defined lane. You are not paying for hidden data. You are paying for a stronger recurring service layer: narrower filtering, prioritization, fit notes, quick watch-outs, and less first-pass review noise over multiple cycles.
| Option | Price | Good fit if... | Store page |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-week pilot | $250 | you want a lighter-commitment test and a quick read on whether the shortlist style is useful | 2-week pilot |
| 4-week pilot better value | $450 | you want a more realistic test across more cycles and a better chance to refine the lane after the first pass | 4-week pilot |
Simple figure: the 2-week pilot at $250 is for a quick first answer; the 4-week pilot at $450 is for a fairer test of repeat usefulness and saves $50 versus stacking two separate 2-week pilots.
The paid pilot should do more than send additional public links. It should improve prioritization, show clearer fit judgment, flag more obvious disqualifiers, and get smarter after feedback from the first pass.
The normal path is: request a sample, review the sample, then start a pilot if the approach feels useful. If you already understand the product shape, you can also begin directly from the store pages above.
It is not a full procurement-intelligence platform, not a proposal-writing service, and not a promise that every listed opportunity will be a fit. It is a tighter recurring signal layer for early review.
The point is not more public links. The point is a recurring review layer that helps a small team decide faster what deserves attention, what to skim, and what to skip before hours get burned on weak-fit notices.